Staples Employee Reviews in Needham, MA

The employee frequently experienced challenges due to consistent understaffing. The work environment was consistently high-pressure, requiring the employee to navigate demanding customer and management expectations. Managers were subject to significant pressure from corporate leadership, which was subsequently reflected in the work environment. The employee experienced considerable stress and fatigue, often returning home exhausted. Previously engaged in smoking cannabis as a coping mechanism, which was discontinued upon leaving the role. Scheduling practices occasionally involved working seven or eight consecutive days against the employee’s preference. Observed instances of nepotism, creating a conflict of interest when raising employee concerns to family members who also held supervisory positions. Prior to the implementation of the current rewards system, managers engaged in practices of enrolling employees in rewards programs without their consent, leading to retaliatory actions against the employee and others who refused to participate.

The employee consistently experienced challenges related to understaffing and high-pressure working conditions, frequently facing competing demands from both management and corporate expectations. Managers were subject to significant pressure from corporate leadership, which was subsequently reflected in the work environment. This resulted in frequent exhaustion and stress, leading to personal coping mechanisms that were subsequently discontinued. Scheduling irregularities, including instances of being scheduled for seven or eight consecutive days against personal preference, were also a recurring issue. The organization experienced issues related to nepotism, creating a conflict of interest when addressing employee concerns with superiors who were also their direct managers. Prior to the implementation of the current rewards system, managers engaged in practices involving the enrollment of employees in reward programs without their consent, leading to retaliatory actions against employees who refused to participate. Furthermore, the organization faced challenges related to internal conflicts and a lack of transparency.