Sysco
|3.1|
Sysco logo

Sysco Employee Reviews in Harrisonburg, VA

Employee Insights in Harrisonburg, VA

Review information last updated August 6, 2025.

Rating Distribution

6 ratings

Summary of Sysco Employee Feedback (AI-Generated)

Limited data available for your filters. Using broader results.
2.2 out of 5

Across all Sysco Virginia positions reviewed, a recurring and significant theme is the challenge of operational instability and a disconnect between management and frontline employees.
The most prevalent concern revolves around unrealistic expectations, particularly regarding workload, scheduling, and performance targets.
Many roles, including Stockers/Order Fillers, Drivers, and Crane Operators, experience high pressure and demanding physical requirements, often without adequate support or clear communication from leadership.
Specifically, the system in Harrisonburg and Suffolk frequently lacks flexibility, and in many locations, management struggles to guarantee predictable shift durations or provide necessary support, leading to employee frustration and a sense of being undervalued.
While compensation is generally considered competitive, this is frequently overshadowed by issues related to work-life balance, operational support, and a perceived lack of investment in employee well-being.
The emphasis on achieving targets often creates a stressful environment, particularly when coupled with inconsistent scheduling.
There is a clear need for Sysco Virginia to prioritize improved communication, more robust training programs, and a management style that fosters a supportive and collaborative work environment.
A significant number of reviews highlight the importance of autonomy and self-management, suggesting a potential area where Sysco can effectively leverage employee strengths.
Ultimately, the reviews consistently point to a need for systemic changes to enhance employee satisfaction and retention across all Virginia locations.

Disclaimer: This review has been generated by AI based on employee feedback. It may not fully represent the company under the current filters. The AI attempts to analyze patterns in reviews but may not capture all nuances of the workplace experience.

Due to limited data for your exact filter criteria, this summary includes broader results.

Highlights

Pros

  • Competitive Compensation (Frequently Mentioned)
  • Potential for Autonomy (Especially in Roles Requiring Self-Management)
  • Focus on Logistics and Customer Service (Across Multiple Roles)

Cons

  • Unrealistic Performance Expectations and Demanding Workloads
  • Unpredictable Scheduling and Lack of Shift Guarantees
  • Poor Communication and Lack of Management Support
Jun 24, 2025
2 out of 5
Order Selector

Tough work, good money in theory

This role presents significant earning potential, though it requires a demanding physical effort to consistently meet performance targets. Employees frequently experienced challenges in achieving required productivity levels, leading to performance-based suspensions and, in severe cases, potential termination. During the COVID-19 pandemic, expectations for sustained high productivity throughout extended shifts (12-14 hours) were unrealistic and unsustainable. Staffing levels were significantly reduced, impacting operational capacity. The role may be suitable for individuals seeking an entry-level position, but it can be particularly stressful and detrimental to physical health for those with less experience. Historical performance expectations, based on past volume levels, were applied to all employees, regardless of current operational constraints.
Compensation/Benefits
3/5
Job Culture
1/5
Management
1/5
Job Work/Life Balance
3/5
Job Security/Advancement
1/5

Pros

Complimentary meals are provided.

Cons

Limited break times, management exhibited a challenging and sometimes overly critical approach, and inconsistencies in order accuracy were observed.

Mar 11, 2025
2 out of 5
Order Selector

Hard work, good pay but is it worth it?

This employee consistently demonstrates a strong work ethic. While the compensation is competitive, scheduling often requires flexibility and the potential to work overtime to achieve desired hours. The role can be physically demanding, and some initial discomfort is common, though employees typically adapt over time. This position would be well-suited for younger individuals due to the physical requirements.
Feb 28, 2025
2 out of 5
Delivery Partner

Good Pay if you can get the hours

Compensation is competitive, however, consistent full-time hours are challenging to secure. The company’s recent expansion has resulted in an increased driver headcount, making it difficult for new hires to achieve a standard 40-hour workweek, particularly without a significant tenure. A more measured hiring approach is recommended to ensure adequate workload distribution.
Compensation/Benefits
4/5
Job Culture
3/5
Management
1/5
Job Work/Life Balance
3/5
Job Security/Advancement
1/5

Pros

Competitive compensation, benefits package

Cons

Limited availability of full-time hours, concerns regarding equipment condition

Feb 25, 2025
2 out of 5
Order Selector

Order selector

Rating Compensation And Benefits
4/5
Rating Career Opportunities
3/5
Rating Culture And Values
2/5
Rating Diversity And Inclusion
2/5
Rating Senior Leadership
1/5
Rating Work Life Balance
3/5

Pros

Competitive compensation and benefits package, with opportunities for overtime.

Cons

The role can be physically demanding, involving heavy lifting with limited break periods.

Feb 10, 2025
1 out of 5
Loader

Sysco is a BAD PLACE TO WORK! THEY CARE NOTHING ABOUT EMPLOYEES, PERIOD

Rating Compensation And Benefits
1/5
Rating Career Opportunities
1/5
Rating Culture And Values
1/5
Rating Diversity And Inclusion
1/5
Rating Senior Leadership
1/5
Rating Work Life Balance
1/5

Pros

None identified. Opportunities for improvement regarding employee benefits and support were lacking.

Cons

Performance goals were consistently unrealistic and appeared to be utilized to maintain compensation at the lowest possible level. Supervisory support was insufficient, demonstrating a lack of concern for employee well-being. High staff turnover during the employee’s six-month tenure contributed to instability. Maintenance of equipment was inadequate, and management involvement was limited. The organization prioritized sales targets over employee support and development.

Dec 18, 2024
1 out of 5
Loader

Sysco is a BAD PLACE TO WORK! THEY CARE NOTHING ABOUT EMPLOYEES, PERIOD

Rating Compensation And Benefits
1/5
Rating Career Opportunities
1/5
Rating Culture And Values
1/5
Rating Diversity And Inclusion
1/5
Rating Senior Leadership
1/5
Rating Work Life Balance
1/5

Pros

None identified. Opportunities for improvement regarding employee benefits and support were lacking.

Cons

Performance goals were consistently unrealistic and appeared to be utilized to maintain compensation at the lowest possible level. Supervisory support was insufficient, demonstrating a lack of concern for employee well-being. High staff turnover during the employee’s six-month tenure contributed to instability. Maintenance of equipment was inadequate, and management engagement was limited. The organization prioritized sales targets over employee support and development.

Want to see more reviews?

Sign in to view all 6 reviews for Sysco

All employee reviews are sourced from Employers.io users, trusted partners, and publicly available information. Opinions expressed in reviews reflect individual experiences and do not represent official statements from Sysco. Contact us to suggest updates to this page.